Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MFR's avatar

Well done, Portland, from top to bottom. The PPB is a joke, where is the enforcement of simple laws? No wonder the city is in a death spiral…..

Marsha Michaelis's avatar

Thank you for this reporting, Kevin.

What do you think should be done, specifically? Is there a place for civil commitment into safe rehabilitation facilities in cases like these?

A recent story out of Seattle reported that a 9-year-old boy is living in a tent in a public park. He's with his parents, when they're around. His mother is a drug addict who prostitutes herself in the tent (making the boy wait in the bushes); his father works and apparently has a long criminal history. Both parents have refused all services for themselves and the boy. CPS and police have visited the tent, and say there is no legal authority to remove the boy.

I actually agree that removing children from parents should be an extreme last resort. That's a hugely traumatic experience for the children, who have a right to the dutiful care of their parents. So, when parents are breaking laws, neglecting their child, etc., why not apply justice and compassion in a way that enforces laws while also upholding the child's rights? Why not commit the entire family to involuntary, long-term rehabilitation? We spent billions on prisons, foster care, and rehab. A more targeted application of all three -- applied to the whole family -- might serve all parties best.

Is there something wrong in that idea? I tend libertarian in my opinions about the use of government power, because I know that's a slippery slope. But it is as harmful to neglect justice as it is to misapply force. Wise application of law (and the force to apply it) is key.

31 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?